By: Munzer Mustafa *
Intermediary leaders play a transformative role in the dynamics of political parties in Sudan, as they promote inclusivity and diversity.
According to political analyst Dr. Ahmed Al-Zubair, they “challenge traditional power structures within parties, and promote a more democratic and inclusive environment” (Al-Zubair, 2019). Their representation of marginalized communities ensures that their voices are heard, leading to more lively internal debates and increased party participation.
Dr. Hala Al-Karib, a Sudanese Human Rights Activist, confirms that they “offer valuable insights and perspectives, drawn from their close association with popular movements and communities” (Al-Karib, 2020), and they recognize the value of their life contributions and experiences, and direct knowledge in making informed, people-based decisions within political parties.
A study conducted by the Sudanese Democracy First Group (SDFG) underscores their importance in amplifying marginalized voices and promoting inclusivity (SDFG, 2018), particularly by advocating for underrepresented communities. The study points to the role of intermediary leaders in empowering marginalized groups and pushing parties to adopt a comprehensive approach in the decision-making process.
Their influence widely extends to policy formulation. The expert Dr. Sarah Abdul-Galil highlights their role in infusing political discussions with popular wisdom, and says: “They achieve a deep understanding of the needs and challenges faced by marginalized communities, and they form policies that effectively address societal issues” (Abdul-Galil, 2017). She adds: “Their contributions greatly shape the parties’ programs, which promotes more responsive and people-focused policies.
Dr. Mohammed Al-Hassan confirms their commitment to these principles, noting that they “call for transparency, accountability, and the protection of human rights, which prompts parties to give priority to these issues in policy formulation,” (Al-Hassan, 2021). Their influence strengthens a culture of responsible governance within political parties.
While Sudan continues its political journey, the relationship between political leaders and political organizations remains dynamic, complex, and tense at best. Despite historical reservations, those emerging from popular movements have played a crucial role in bridging the gap between political organizations and the population on a broader scale, driven by the concerns, aspirations and grievances of these communities. Moreover, they defend their interests and strive hard to make their voices heard in decision-making processes. They even mobilize popular support around specific visions, establish ties and build bridges, including building trust and strengthening relationships. However, this seasonal support is conditional on a package of reforms on issues of governance, human rights and social justice to make political processes more people-focused, more responsive, and closer to the public’s priorities. Still, the spring of joint action quickly fades with the heat of the summer of hesitation to embrace popular demands, and then the intermediate leaderships become a threat to the existing power structures, or so the leadership of the political system, believes.
Challenges and opportunities are now intertwined as intermediary leaders and political organizations embark on a new, transformative journey to pave the way for cooperation, including their intention to benefit from diverse perspectives in overcoming obstacles, and harnessing the power of unity to shape a brighter future for the nation.
To be continued.
* Munzer Mustafa Researcher at the Public Policies Institute-Sudan, Saturday, December 2, 2023
